Assessing Effectiveness of Passive Exoskeletons and Tool Selection on Ergonomic Safety in Manhole Cover Removal

Assessing Effectiveness of Passive Exoskeletons and Tool Selection on Ergonomic Safety in Manhole Cover Removal

Blog Article

Manual material handling, a common practice in oceane eau de toilette various industries, often involves moving or lifting heavy objects, placing significant physical strain on workers, especially in the lower back.A prime example is manhole cover removal, which typically requires handling heavy weights, potentially leading to lower back muscle strain.This study investigates the effectiveness of a passive exoskeleton in reducing ergonomic risks during manhole cover removal.

Twenty able-bodied workers participated, performing the task with and without extractor tools in the field.Techniques such as surface electromyography and inertial measurement units were employed to measure muscle activity and body posture using the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA).This study compared muscle activities and REBA scores under different conditions: manually lifting covers, using an in-house lever tool, and using a el reformador tequila anejo sledgehammer and a pick bar tool named Jake, both with and without an exoskeleton.

Results revealed that the in-house Lever tool was the safest and most efficient method, resulting in the lowest muscle activities and REBA scores, regardless of exoskeleton use.Interestingly, the exoskeleton significantly reduced muscle strain when using the Jake tool.These findings indicate that while the Lever tool is optimal for this task, passive exoskeletons can effectively lower ergonomic risks associated with more physically demanding tools.